Report into hospital crimes delayed due to the sheer ‘volume of evidence’

Co-founder of Pickering - Polly Taylor

In a progress update from the Independent Inquiry set up by the Health Secretary following Fuller’s conviction last year, chairman Sir Jonathan Michael says the first phase of the inquiry is ‘firmly under way’.

But he added: “Because the Inquiry has already received a greater volume of evidence than had been expected, the initial report is now expected to be published later in 2022 rather than in the middle of the year as anticipated.”

This initial report is set to focus on evidence received from relatives and colleagues of Fuller to consider how the mortuary offences could have taken place without detection, what lessons the Trust could learn and to address the most likely questions of the victims’ families and key stakeholders.

David Fuller, 68, is serving two whole life terms for the 1987 murders of Tunbridge Wells women Wendy Knell, 25, and Caroline Pierce, 20.

He is also serving an additional 12 years in prison for abusing more than 100 dead bodies in mortuaries at Tunbridge Wells Hospital and its forerunner the Kent and East Sussex Hospital.

In his progress update, published last week, Sir Jonathan says the inquiry has been hearing from the families of Fuller’s victims since March.

The inquiry is also looking into how Fuller could gain access to the mortuary in his role as an electrician.

Evidence has been supplied from contractors Interserve Group and Mitie Group, which had responsibility for facilities management at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, and for whom Fuller had worked.

Sir Jonathan said that the inquiry was aiming to publish its final report, looking at the broader national picture and the wider lessons for the NHS and other settings, at some point in 2023.

DAUGHTER LOSES HIGH COURT CASE OVER THE FULLER INQUIRY

A woman whose mother’s corpse was abused by David Fuller at Tunbridge Wells Hospital has lost a High Court fight with Health Secretary Sajid Javid over arrangements for a public inquiry into the convicted murder’s crimes.

Amanda Miah, whose mother Sonia Miah died aged 54 in 2018, complained to a High Court judge last Tuesday (May 17), that arrangements for an inquiry into the crimes of David Fuller infringed her human right to protection from degrading treatment.

But Mr Justice Swift, who heard arguments at a hearing in London, refused to give her the go-ahead to stage a legal challenge after concluding that she did not have an arguable case.

A barrister representing her argued that arrangements for the inquiry did not ‘meet the needs’ of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which says no-one should be subjected to ‘inhuman or degrading’ treatment.

Jude Bunting QC told the judge that the claim was ‘strongly arguable’ and of ‘considerable wider importance’.

He said: “The proposed inquiry falls far short of the standards set by Article 3.

“In particular: the inquiry has no power to compel witnesses or disclosure; there will be no public scrutiny of the evidence; the next-of-kin will not be able to play any role in suggesting questions, in considering the evidence, and in shaping the inquiry.”

Mr Bunting also said Sir Jonathan Michael lacked ‘practical independence’ due to his former role as a chief executive of NHS Trusts, but the case was thrown out.

Share this article

Recommended articles

Search

Please enter a search term below.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter